There are two girls from Edmonton who are apparently going down to compete in some Miss Tattoo contest. The one is very pretty, and has rad tattoos/mods. The other is pretty.. but has not great tattoos, and not a ton. I have no idea why she is going or how on earth she thinks she can compete with will most likely be there. She doesnt even stand a chance next to the one she is going down with.
I think *I* have WAY nicer tattoos than her. And more. But I have small boobs and she is much prettier. But its about the tattoos! Right?!?
Ok. That's it for now. Thats been on my mind for a while now... had to get it out.
6 comments:
I know of who you speak. Speaking as a guy that likes pretty girls and thinks it's even better if those pretty girls have excellent art on their skin, you have far nicer tattoos than either (from what I've seen of all parties). I actually found the choices very amusing when I first heard of this retarded Miss Tattoo contest. I know of far prettier girls with far nicer tattoos. Oh well.
ps. Big boobs aren't all they're cracked up to be. Exhibit A: Sweaty under boob, or more commonly, swits.
pps. She isn't prettier than you.
ppps. I totally assume I know which of the two you are referring to as prettier. :)
H is waaaaay prettier than L.
i think H is prettier than me, maybe its a toss up between L and me, she just dolls up lots more than i do, so i feel plain...
I have no idea who either of them are, but they sure as hell ain't prettier than you!
The whole concept sounds kinda silly too...
this shit:
http://misstattoousa.com/
what. the. fuck.
you know, upon looking at that site, and the women that win.. i think that people with nice tattoos or alot, just think more of themselves and dont even enter...
what a joke!!!
Post a Comment